|



| | 
Breaking News
-
MINISTER WEATHERILL
Jay
Weatherill will be sadly missed in the Family and Communities Portfolio.
Minister Weatherill had a keen appreciation of the issues and had always
conducted himself professionally and honestly in a very difficult
portfolio. We look forward to continuing to work with Jay Weatherill
as Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation and we warmly welcome
Minister Rankine to her new portfolio.

Recent Media Coverage of
OARS SA
 |
20/08/2008
The issues associated with South Australia's high level of remand
prisoners has again surfaced. Lean Byner on Radio 5AA asked
the question "Why should we care about how remand prisoners are
treated?" Dr Craig Raeside spoke about this, and the OARS SA
perspective was also put to Leon by CEO Leigh Garrett. It seems to
us that the critical issue about whether South Australians should care
about the way we treat remandees, and all prisoners for that point, is
that almost all are released back in to the community. The
better the conditions, and the better the treatment they receive, the
better citizens they will become after released. CEO Leigh Garrett also
questioned the custom and practice associated assessing all remandees as
High Security prisoners. Leigh made it clear that the
Department for Correctional Services would only be placing remandees in
G Division if their bahaviour warranted it or out of desparation for
space.
As a matter of interest, OARS SA has approached the Justice
Department to fund a structured bail accommodation service, but this has
been refused.
|
 |
7/08/2008
Chris Kenny in the Advertiser 6/8/2008 (Minor crims deserve a prison
break) further questions the relevance and effectiveness of our
overuse of incarceration in this State. He could probably write
an article every week questioning criminal justice systems that are
manipulated by ignorant politicians across the world, who conceal the truth
from the public, who create more victims of crime, and who destroy lives and
the futures of offenders and their families. Here is a few searching
questions the people of South Australia might ask both the Government and
Opposition in SA in relation to their justice policies. Is South
Australia the only State in Australia that still retains the right of
politicians (through Executive Council) to make the final decisions about
permitting parole? Is South Australia the only State that
retains its Crime Statistics Bureau within the domain of the Attorney
General's Department? Is the average length of prison sentence
extremely low in South Australia because we churn through hundreds of
prisoners on very short sentences? Are hundreds of people locked away
in prison because they cannot find accommodation to gain legitimate Parole,
legitimate Home Detention, or who cannot be bailed because of homelessness?
Does the incarceration of parents devastate the futures of their children,
who are the innocent secondary victims of crime? Do the children
of offenders, who receive virtually no targeted support, go on to repeat the
criminal lives of their parents? The responses of both major political
parties in South Australia to these questions would make interesting
reading.
|
 |
6/08/2008
The new prisons being designed for Mobilong are apparently the most
technologically advanced in Australia. So reports the Sunday Mail on
Sunday 3rd August. This article is deeply unbalanced because it
almost completely ignores the important requirement for offender treatment
and rehabilitation. Some of the systems described in the article will enhance the lives of prisoners and visitors, provide
less intrusive ways of searching visitors (thus maintaining dignity and
reducing false positives) and possibly keep the community safer. They
may ensure more humane care and they will improve the efficiency of the
prisons.
A really important question does remain unanswered however. When
was the last escape attempt, or successful escape from behind the walls of a
maximum or medium security prison, in South Australia? Escape
attempts world-wide are now focussed during transport between prisons or
between courts and prisons. We would do well to remember
that the most critical factor in the success of any prison anywhere is the
quality of the relationships developed between prison staff and those in
their care. In fact prison security depends significantly on
these relationships as well. The focus in this article on the
so-called Supermax concept is unnecessary. Supermax prisons
capture public attention and make great headlines but are fraught with
danger. Australia's first so-called Supermax wing in Long Bay
Gaol called Katingal, devastated the humanity of all who were sent within
its walls. Prisoners never saw another human being whilst within
its walls unless it was because of illness or misbehaviour.
Prisoners were dehumanised to the point of seeking a way out. I
was told by staff of Long Bay gaol that Katingal had the highest suicide
rate of any prison in the world just prior to it being closed decades ago.
I am sure the Department for Correctional Services needs a high security
wing for prisoners who are violent or mentally ill, but I am also sure that
that they are not calling this a Supermax facility with all of the
subsequent negatives that attach to it.
|
 |
30/07/2008
Chris Kenny presents a really good article in the Advertiser on the 30th
July in his TALK column. Chris says "Our prison system fails
everyone". He is correct at one level, but the broader
issue is that the entire criminal justice system fails everyone.
Our prison system simply cannot keep up with the huge increases in
offending numbers in spite of its best efforts. Other
jurisdictions across the world have already worked out that increasing
incarceration fails. The UK Labor Government went down the
get tough pathway, and over the last 2 years both privately and publicly
have been begging the judiciary to sentence at the lower end of the
range because of the massive overcrowding in their prisons. The
judiciary have said no. The judges say to the politicians
"You changed the laws and we will sentence according to them".
A number of States in the USA have started to reduce sentences because
they were facing insolvency, primarily because of the massive costs
associated with imprisoning everyone. If incarceration actually
worked, that is if it actually solved the problems of crime, the cost
might be worth it. Our view is that for the vast majority of
prisoners, it actually makes things worse. The issue of the costs
of incarceration was dealt with in OARS SA recent newsletter.
Download the
Cost of Justice article here.
The full text of the information OARS SA provided for Chris Kenny is
here.
OARS SA Statement. We must address
the causes of crime through early intervention. Restorative
Justice also presents a very positive range of alternatives if early
intervention fails. One wonders if the so-called Gang of 49
offenders might benefit from some restorative interventions to help them
understand the impact and harm associated with their crimes on victims.
Restorative interventions in the UK have shown that repeat offending can
be reduced and victims assisted, when opportunities are provided for
victims and offenders to meet face to face. The current
strategy with young aboriginal offenders seems like a significant
failure.
|
 | 25/07/2008 Comments reported by
DPP Stephen Pallaras in the Advertiser July 25th 2008 about the OARS SA
Public Forum. Mr Pallaras said among many other things that
justice was not well served by current policies. |
|